Without Boundaries
- Kristin Kowalski Ferragut

- Jun 30, 2023
- 3 min read
I love words and spend much of my time playing with them. And not often, but perhaps more often than most, I come across a word I hate, sometimes a word I liked that’s been bastardized into a form I hate. In the past several weeks, I’ve frequently bumped up against a word that I maybe didn’t love before, but had a rather romantic-to-neutral impression of. Now — it’s just annoying. The word is “boundaries”.
When I think of boundaries, I think of crossing space, entering new space, exploration. When I think of boundaries I think of things that can be contained, but as much so, how artificial the containment is. I understand private property and national sovereignty, but also, on a deeper core level, scoff at the thought of anyone actually owning a beach, for example. I think of pushing boundaries in an expansive, life-affirming sense — the way unjust laws are broken, the way disciplines seep into each other.
Webster defines boundaries as, “something that indicates or fixes a limit or extent.”(1) By this definition, it’s not incompatible to apply boundaries to expectations in relationships, but its widespread use to every aspect of a relationship seems extreme and to lack both meaningful specificity and nuance. Also, to me it has connotations of a line being drawn, which feels less than collaborative or romantic, at least in its far-reaching application.
Many of the examples of boundaries that one might set in relationships include expectations that the other person not be a jerk, i.e. “ask permission,” “take one another’s feelings into account,” “show respect for differences in opinion, perspective, and feelings."(2) I don’t understand how this shorthand of “set boundaries” helps the dialogue, either in establishing expectations with a friend or partner or when thinking through personal needs or aversions.
Depending on the psych source, there seem to be five to seven categories of boundaries to set in a relationship. I’ll list six: physical boundaries, emotional boundaries, time boundaries, sexual boundaries, intellectual boundaries, and material boundaries.(3) Basically, it seems that popular advice would have every aspect of interaction defined by boundaries. Well, I choose not to see boundaries in anything as complex, unpredictable, ever-changing, and nuanced as relationships. Is that to say that I lack a sense of my own needs, desires, and expectations? No. I suppose I have boundaries as popularly used, but I don’t perceive them in those terms. Have there been situations in my life where someone close to me has failed to fulfill communicated and agreed upon expectations or done things I expected would be deal breakers? Of course. Have I forgiven those? Always. Have I regretted continuing in relationships when that has happened? Rarely.
Of course I believe in being clear on expectations and deal breakers. But also I think it’s weird that boundaries is the word around which people are wrapping the conversation. It seems to me that compatibility, acceptance, love, and support is arrived at, not from a long litany of rules and lines in the sand, but from sharing our authentic selves, collaboration, compromise, and respect.
One may argue that I’m knocking up against people referencing boundaries so much because I maybe could be well-served by setting and sticking to some. Perhaps. But also, I’m in a space, historically and geographically, that seems to hold psychology as the primary tool for understanding and good health. I respect psychology and am grateful that people benefit from it, but it’s not my go-to compass or comfort. When a friend or acquaintance starts advising me on setting boundaries, it hardly seems appropriate to explain the ways in which I reject the frame of reference, but it still seems worth putting an explanation out there.





https://xosoplus.mobi/soi-cau-xsdt.html mình lướt thử cho biết vì thấy mọi người hay nói tới, ai ngờ nhìn cũng dễ chịu phết. Trang chia nội dung theo từng mảng nên không bị ngợp, kéo xuống là thấy ngay phần “soi cầu Đồng Tháp hôm nay” ghi rõ theo ngày kiểu Thứ 2, 20/07/2026 nên đỡ nhầm. Mình cũng thích cái đoạn kết quả kỳ trước họ để dạng bảng số, nhìn nhanh là nhận ra từng giải chứ không dính thành một cục chữ. Nói chung cảm giác như họ ưu tiên cho người xem lướt nhanh, tiêu đề từng khối nổi rõ và mấy bảng số được căn hàng cột khá gọn trên trang.
bongdalu 808 hôm nọ mình cũng tò mò vào thử vì thấy mọi người nhắc hoài. Mình không rành soi kèo hay đọc tin sâu đâu, chỉ lướt xem trang họ trình bày dữ liệu kiểu gì. Cảm giác đầu tiên là phần tỷ số trực tuyến nhìn khá “gọn mắt”, các dòng kết quả xếp theo dạng danh sách nên liếc cái là nắm được ngay. Kéo xuống cũng không bị ngộp vì họ chia khối nội dung rõ, chữ số canh thẳng hàng nên nhìn nhanh không mỏi. Mình thích kiểu ưu tiên thông tin chính trước, không phải bấm nhiều mới thấy. Nói chung vào xem vài phút là quen tay, nhất là mấy box tỷ số…
keo nha cai 5 hôm bữa mình vào thử lúc đang rảnh, kiểu chỉ muốn xem trang họ sắp xếp bài vở ra sao thôi. Lướt một vòng thấy họ để các bài nhận định soi kèo theo dạng danh sách nên nhìn khá nhanh, không phải bấm qua lại nhiều. Có trận Stjarnan vs Valur (02h15 ngày 18 07) hiện ngay gần đầu, tiêu đề kèm giờ giấc rõ ràng nên mình nhận ra liền. Mình cũng thích đoạn mô tả ngắn dưới tiêu đề, đọc lướt vài dòng là biết bối cảnh trận đấu chứ không bị dài dòng. Trên điện thoại cuộn xuống vẫn ổn, chữ dễ nhìn và các khối nội dung tách ra gọn gàng,…
:0) This makes me smile. You live life your own way, and I love that.
To my free spirited, live and let live, alway accepting friend and author—well done!